« Savoir être superficiel par profondeur. » I
extract this maxim from Georges Salles “Le regard” – The look. The deep know how to be superficial – the English explains too much, decompresses
the spring, here. English is a good language for punchlines, while French is
one for epigrams.
I came upon the name Georges Salles in Adrienne Monnier’s
essay about her late friend, Walter Benjamin, published by Mercure de France in
1952. Monnier was Sylvia Beach’s lover – two real live muses, Beach, of course,
of James Joyce, and Monnier of a number of writers, including Walter Benjamin,
who she first met in 1930 at her famous bookstore/salon. He wrote Monnier a
letter when he was on his final flight from the Nazis out of Paris to Marseilles,
and then, by a fatal misstep, by way of the Pyrenees to Spain.
“I keep thinking of you not only in dreaming of Paris and
rue de L’Odeon, for which I wish the most powerful and least solicited
protective divinities – but also a many of the intersections of my thought.”
A muse in need of a muse.
Georges Salles’ Le
Regard was a shared enthusiasm of Monnier and Benjamin. Salles was,
officially, an expert on “Asian” art. He was also a great defender of the art
of the connoisseur, an art founded not, for him, on signatures, on attribution,
but on the ocular enjoyment – like the tongue, the eye has its pure pleasures. Salles
was the grandchild of Gustave Eiffel, and the collaborator of Andre Malraux.
However, a book about the sensual delight of the visible, published in 1939,
was not likely to survive the sensual horror of the war.
« The certainty of the amateur’s glance is neither
more intellectual nor less organic than the selection of a gourmet. Everything
happens in the shokc of an impression, confusing to our mind but distinct to
our senses.” Here was a man of a certain
radical empiricism: thought follows the senses at a distance, as the kite, as
spectacular as it may be, follows the string held by the child. The child determines,
in the last instance, whether to bring the kite down or to let it go.
It is the last chapter of The Look that might have truly
fired up Benjamin: the day. The author goes out of the museum, away from the
paintings and sculptures, and into the streets of Paris to use his heightened
optical sense. This return to life is I think something we have all experienced
– although for me the experience is going from a movie that has really
delighted me or moved me out of the theatre into the streets. Ideally, the
movie ends at, say, eight o’clock p.m. on an early spring day. Ideally, the
city is New Orleans or Atlanta – and I am in my twenties. The transfer from one
realm of fascination to another is a curiously delayed passage – the streets “look”
cinematic. This experience is described by no one better than Walker Percy in The
Movie Goer. I know the streets that Percy’s character, Binx, walked around. I
have a distinct memory of coming out of Prytania theatre dazzled by one movie
or another, and walking back across Audobon Park to the apartment in the upper
floor of one of the big houses that I shared with Frank. Frank is long gone in
my life, a boat that has drifted away, but I do remember the elevation of
common life that succeeded seeing some movies, that little extra around things –
as Nietzsche puts it in the intro to the Twilight of the Idols, “nothing
succeeds without some measure of exaggeration. The too much of force is proof
of force.”
This is named, approximately, the “Search” in the Moviegoer.
Binx, the narrator, calls it waking up and finding one is in a strange place. “The
movies are onto the search but they screw it up.” Or sometimes, when you are
young, they give you the impulse. Even movies shown on TV gave me that moment,
sometimes.
It isn’t such a long distance from Georges Salles in 1939 in
Paris (to whom Benjamin dedicated his last published bit of writing when he was
still alive) and me in 1982, walking home from the Prytania movie theatre. An
almost equal distance separates me from 1982 and 1982 from 1939. In Seven
league boots, I go backwards.
11 comments:
« Savoir être superficiel par profondeur. » I wonder if Salles is thinking of Nietzsche - the last part of the preface to "la gaya scienza"?
- Sophie
Sophie, either Nietzsche or Gide or Wilde. Salles was not a name known to me, but having made a little foray into Salles-wissenschaft on the Web, I love this guy.
Undoubtedly, your aunt read him.
Well, I thought of the Nietzsche passages re Salles as the Salles line is pretty much a quotation from Nietzsche who might be quoting someone else...and yes I found it in my aunt's notebooks. (Btw, I find it hard to refer to her as my aunt, as when I was very little she told me and my sis to never call her "aunt". Made her feel old, she said. And so we never did. I'd have loved to see her get old. She never did.)
Aside from the Salles, the part that struck me in your post was about walking out after watching a movie and everything "looking" a bit different. That isn't only something I've found in her notebooks, she had a sense of that, which she shared with me, going to movies together and walking afterwards. Another example of your strange telepathy with her.
- Sophie
Sorry about calling Amie your aunt. I guess that those names are more natural as you get older. I have an eleven year old son, and I refer to his aunts and uncles all the time. If Amie were alive today, I wonder if "aunt" would bother her or vaguely thrill her? Definitely being called Dad vaguely thrills me. Like, I can't believe my luck.
Anyway, I like your description of going out of the movies with Amie. I miss her.
Ahh, well Amie was definitely - not vaguely - thrilled to be called 'maman' by her daughter. I distinctly remember when she proudly told my mom, sis and me of that occurence. Julie, her daughter, was only a few months old at the time so we were incredulous. She was holding Julie in her arms, and she bent down and whispered to her, and Julie waved her arms and legs and said maman, followed by mumblings that was incomprehensible to us but probably not between them. That kid is ahead of the curve, to put it mildly.
So your son is 11, and if I recall correctly earlier posts, somewhat of a movie goer. I seem to remember that he watched Oppenheimer and Barbie. I haven't seen the former and have no interest in doing so, the latter I thought was rather good. This post had me thinking of the movies Amie took me to by that age. They were many, but can I take the liberty of recommending a few, though your son might have seen them already.
Tati - Playtime. (She took me to all of his films. Sadly not that many.)
Abbas Kiarostami- Where is my Friend's House? ( We watched the Koker trilogy all in one day as theater was screening all three. 'Life and nothing but' is probably her/my fave but best begin with the first.)
Murnau - Sunrise
Tarkovsky - Ivan's Childhood
Clarence Brown - National Velvet
Ozu - I was born but
I should stop, all flooding back....
- Sophie
I love hearing Amie stories! YOu know, Amie and I were great correspondants, but we had boundaries. For instance, I have no idea what Amie looked like. I'm not sure she knew what I looked like. When I moved to Paris to live with Antonia, in 2010, we were going to meet, but then I got an email from her friend Emily...
Anyway, she was a big influence on me, and her spirit is probbably still a big influence on me.
I've gone back to Amie's emails to me, sorta nostalgically. Do you remember walking with her when some guys shouted sexist stuff at you all, and she poured a beer on his head, and you recited a Baudelaire poem? Amie's account was like a little prose poem. She was something else, your aunt.
Yes, I remember. je suis belle, o mortels!
- Sophie
Please pardon another comment. I wasn't meaning to believe me, but somehow this thread made Amie's spirit make a visit and give me an earful. Which went something like this: Sophie, you know I never ever had a harsh word for you and not about to start now. But this thread is not exactly your best effort is it, not from the girl I heard recite a Baudelaire poem and shut up a bunch of drunk knuckleheads and their obscenities. I mean I'm kinda moved that you refer to the Salles and Nietzsche quotes you found in my notebooks, but you didn't mention that the stuff I'm forever returning to with Fred N. is the the stuff about Socrates, make music and believing in a God who could dance. Not suggesting that you take a deep dive into my notebooks on LI, god no.
Movies, music, dancing. Ring a bell?
And the thing is, if you're going to refer to yours truly on LI a music video is de rigueur. I know you've been through LI back pages so must know this. If you were to do so, I'd suggest not going the Pasolini/Bach or Godard/Beethoven route. And leave our beloved Catherine Ringer out of it this time. Something superficial rather and something that reminds you of me would be nice if I may ask - the two should be easy enough to bring together. Something that makes the trivial shimmer a little, breaks the everyday routine. If for a instant. We're only here for an instant. Music and song is how we fucking survive. So find something Sophie, you can do this.
Besides, it's time that LI had some comments with music, been a while. Just remember, it says on LI: always for love, never for money.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPSrLXPb2Pw
Sophie, thanks for this visit from Amie's spirit! Which brings a lot of nostalgia to my ticker. True, the music has been lacking around her. Although, funnily enough, my Karen Chamisso Claire poem is about muusic videos and learning how to deprovincialize yourself. So here's a shot back to the Annie Lennox eighties. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o6f593X6rv8
Post a Comment