There was a fad, in the eighties, for comparing the French Revolution
unfavorably to the American Revolution. In that illwind of a decade, the
reasoning was reliably coldwar-ish: the French Revolution led straight to the
Gulag, whereas the American revolution led to: America!
In hindsight, and even then, one could see what was bogus
about this judgment. For instance, its in your face racism. Black people simply
didn’t count for the Francois Furet kind of historian. For another thing, the
genocide necessary to create a white nation on the North American continent
didn’t count. And finally, the judgment was really not about the Gulag, but
about the great countervailing egalitarianism of the post-war years. It was
that egalitarian that the cold war historians were particularly eager to dismantle.
Of course, this dismantling was never put so crudely. In
fact, a synthesis between in-egalitarianism and egalitarianism was established,
under the aegis of neo-liberalism. Here, the destruction of egalitarianism as a
force in the political economy was coupled with egalitarianism as a civil
matter. To put it in the class terms that were such a taboo in the Reagan-Thatcher-Mitterand
years, the upper class – which was almost entirely white, but was also a compound
of people with different sexual desires and genders – accepted a certain kind
of feminism and a certain kind of gay rights; both denuded of their original,
grass-roots connection with larger issues of class. This meant that feminism was
reshaped to consist of “breaking the glass ceiling” for upper class women, and
not at all of paying for housework, or extending socialized childcare to all
reaches and pockets of society.
The civil egalitarianism borrowed the mythology of the civil
rights movement, but – in a gesture of true cultural expropriation – did not
borrow the color the skins involved. In 1960, in the U.S., there were almost no
rich African-Americans. In 2015, according to a study produced by the Federal
Reserve in St. Louis, rich African
Americans – defined as the upper one percent – made up a grand total of 1.7% of
the whole.
The best model for the political economy – and the politics
that has driven it - of the last forty years is that of a stalactite. Small
drops have created a large pointy structure. When I was a kid, the idea was
that we were in the midst of a stalagmite change – the drops were mounting from
the bottom. The switch from one to the other has sort of defined my life, and billions
of other lives.
This is worth thinking about when the next headline
catastrophe announces itself: the union busting, rightwing Justice Kennedy
resigning; children put in cages and left in the Texas heat; trillion dollar
giveaways to the wealthy; the gutting of labor unions. It is trivial, but
symbolically large, that the official opposition to rightwing plutocrats is
very, very, very concerned that we all stay “civil”. The official opposition is
almost surely in or connected to the upper 1 percent.
The overwhelming “feeling” of the last forty years has been
one of “not being able to afford things.” For instance, medicare for all is a
huge “budget-buster”. Which begs the question: how is it that in a society that
is at least ten times as wealthy as it was in 1950, or 1960, when large social
insurance scheme were put in place, we have run out of money? The answer is
pretty simple: since then, the working class – in fact, every household that
makes less than 250 thou a year – has run out of money. All the money is packed
in the upper 10 percent, and in the upper 10 percent, it is packed in the upper
1 percent. The inequality is staggering: it is, really, ancien regime, as
though the French Revolution had never happened. The experiment is running its
course: a political economy in which the cultural expectation of egalitarianism
are systematically attacked is one that will, eventually, have to take down
even the mask of democratic practices. The idea that abortion rights are being threatened
because one farty old man on the Court resigns shows a terrifying blindness to
what has happened in state after state for twenty years. It is easier to get an
abortion in Ireland than it is in, say, Texas or Mississippi. For working class
women, abortion rights – not to speak of the vast vast array of healthcare
rights – are a sort of ghost. They are dead, but they still haunt us.
I’m a verbal, even a garrulous, even a graphomaniacal guy.
But this Youtube video about wealth in the U.S. should be your absolute guideas to what has, what is, and what will be happening in the U.S.
No comments:
Post a Comment