Who remembers James Oliver Hubert? That was the McDonald’s
Massacre, 21 killed, July 18, 1984. He screamed as he shot, I’ve killed
thousands. How about Patrick Sherril, post office worker, who killed 15 in the
Edmond Oklahoma, post office, August 20, 1986? How about William Bryan Cruse? That was the Publix in Palm Bay
Florida, 6 killed, 13 wounded, April 23, 1987. Cruse was 60 years old. Then
there was Joseph Wesbecker, who, in spite of his mental health issues, was able
to purchase the AK 47 that he used to kill seven of his former co-workers at
the Standard Gravure plant in Louisville, Kentucky, September 15, 1989. How
about James Edward Pough? That was ten people, the GMAC office, Jacksonville
Florida, 1990. How about John T. Miller? Five people, Social Services office, Watkin
Glens, New York, October 15, 1992. How about George Hennard, the doctor’s son,
in the Luby’s in Kileen Texas, 23 killed, October 16, 1991? The papers at the
time said it was America’s greatest mass shooting. This may or may not be true.
Then, showing that an armed camp is not
necessarily a safe camp, there was Dean A. Mellberg, who went onto the hospital
at the Fairchild Airforce Base in Spokane Washington and killed 4, wounded 21,
and was killed himself on June 20, 1994. Remember Dean? Mental problems. AK 47.
AK 47s are one of the arms of choice. For instance, drifter Patrick Edward
Purdy was able to acquire one, although he had difficulty acquiring employment,
and used it to kill five and injure 30 at the Cleveland Elementary school in
Stockton, California, January 17, 1989. His victims ranged in age from 6 to 10
years old. William D. Baker used an AK 47 to kill four at the International
Truck and Engine Core plant in Melrose Park, Illinois, on February 5, 2001.
Funny thing, but the 66 year old Baker was about to go to prison.
Unfortunately, nobody had taken away his extensive arm collection before the
date he was to turn himself in. Doug Williams, in Meridian Mississippi, killed
his victims – four blacks, as he avowedly hated blacks, and one white, besides
himself – with a semi-automatic rifle at the Lockheed Martin plant where he
worked on June 8, 2003. Newspapers noted that the event was the worst work-site mass killing in 2 and ½ years – a record
of peace and calm! Perhaps the benchmark they were using was the slaying of seven in Wakefield, Massachussetts, on
December 26, 2000. Michael McDermott, who worked at Edgewater Technology, came
to work toting a semi-automatic rifle, a semi-automatic pistol, and a twelve
gauge shotgun. How about church mass murders? Do you remember Matthew Murray,
who killed five and wounded five at two churches in Colorado, on December 10,
2007? Or the two monks killed in a monastery in Conception, Missouri, on June
10, 2002. The killer was a 71 year old farmer, Lloyd Robert Jeffress. Remember
Lloyd? The seven killed by Larry Ashbrook at the youth service in Fort Worth Wedgewood
Baptist, and wounded 7. This was on September 15, 1999. And lest we seem to be highlighting
Christians, there’s the 9 Buddhist monks slain at the Promkunaram Wat temple
outside of Phoenix, on August 10, 1991. Eventually, the killers were found.
They used rifles, Alessandro Garcia and Jonathan Doody. They were 16 and 17
years old. Of course, churches and schoolyards are not the only sites that
gunmen descend on in America. Carl Drega, a former nuclear plant worker, 67,
killed four and wounded four before killing himself in Columbia, New Hampshire,
because of court disputes. One of the dead was, in fact, a judge. This was on
August 19, 1997. He used a rifle. “Authorities found hundreds of pounds of
explosives and an elaborate system of tunnels” on his property. A lawyer, Richard S. Baumhammers, decided to
express his ideas about the supremecy of the white Christian race by killing
his Jewish neighbor, an Indian, two Chinese and a black man in Mckees Rocks, Pennsylvania,
on April 28, 2000. Surely you remember Richard? That was after a black man in
Pennsylvania, Ronald Taylor, in Wilkensburg, shot and killed three. The
landlord never fixed the door in Taylor’s apartment. Taylor sought out whites. Then
there are the family issues. We all have probably forgotten retired Air Force sergeant
Gene Simmons. He killed 16 in Russellville, Arkansas, on Christmas Eve in 1987.
Fourteen were family members who’d come to the Simmons house for a Christmas
party. They ranged from the 20 month old to the 46 year old wife. Firepower
included two 38 caliber pistols. These killings, it is said, inspired another
family Christmas massacre, as Robert Dressman shot and killed six people eating
at the table in Algona, Iowa, two days after Simmons capture. Dressman killed
himself, too. Do you remember David
McGowan, 44, an investigator for the Riverside D.A.’s department? He used his duty
pistol to slay his wife, his mother, and his three kids before shooting
himself, on May 11, 2005.
Mass slaying is as American as apple pie. It goes back. In
Norwalk, Iowa, for instance, the Forsyth family slaying, in which the estranged
husband killed his wife, his two children, and two childen she was babysitting
(June 14, 1993) succeeds, by some fifty four years, the slaying of five of the seven McCanich
children by the mother, who shot them and then shot herself (October 31, 1937).
It is claimed, in an article in the October issue of The Smithsonian http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/story-first-mass-murder-us-history-180956927/?no-ist
that Howard Unruh, who, after a bad day, took his German Lugar pistol and
walked around Camden New Jersey killing people at random on Labor Day, 1949,
performed the first modern mass murder in this country. But how about Gilbert
Twigg, who opened fire on a concert crowd in Winfield Kansas and killed six on August
13, 1904? Patrick Sauer identifies Unruh as the first due to two things: the
randomness of the killing and the rapid fire of the technology. Twigg used a
double barreled 12 gauge shot gun. But he was able, with this weapon, to
inflict enormous damage, wounding 25 men and one woman.
The question is why. Lately, every massacre becomes a
political insult match. Ah, the right wing fascist! Oh, the liberal protected
Muslim! But one can pretty much predict that persons, mostly male, from every
walk of life in America will be the perpetrators of the next one and the next
and the next. What, for instance, produces the school killer? This isn’t a
recent phenom. Verlin Spencer was a South Pasadena principle who, on May 6,
1940, killed five colleagues in the classic manner – stalking through an institutional space, the school district
headquarters, and systematically killing. In perhaps the most horrific school
murder in US history, Andrew Kehoe, who was a., disgruntled, b., male, and c.,
55 – it is surprising how many mass murderers are older – blew up a school in
Bath Michigan, killing 44 and wounding 90. This was in 1927. In Grant Duwe’s
history of mass murder in the US, he claims that there was a mass murder wave
between 1900 and 1939, a trough in the 1940 to 1965 period, and a second mass
murder wave which extends to 1999. Duwe, though, is rather captious about his
definitions. Spree murders are not mass murders by his definition. This strikes
me as a not very well motivated division. His definition is of that a mass
murder mmust occur within a 24 hour period and include at least four victims.
In my opinion, the intent to kill might not result in murder in many cases, but
is nonetheless the operant motive.
In any case, Duwe’s explanation is that the 1940 to 1965
period was conformist, religious, affluent, and did not witness a mass black
market in drugs. Yet, there were still mass murders going on.
It isn’t as though mass murder were confined to the US. If
we look at European history, and we distinguish the violence of war from that
of individual violence (which I consider a dubious division, but so be it), we
can find many mass murders, but no consistent, monthly tendency to mass murder
as we find in the US. True, American civilians own an astonishing amount of
firepower – 88 guns per 100 people. Compare that with Spain, where the number
is 11 guns per 100 persons. In France, which is pretty much at the EU norm, it
is 31. That is still a lot of guns. Many Americans mistakenly believe that
Europeans do not own guns. What is true is that gun ownership is more regulated
and overseen, generally. Not everywhere, however. In Italy, for instance, the
figure is around 12 per 100, but this disguises the fact that the law allows
the individual to own a number of weapons with loose regulatory supervision.
However, it seems to me that the regulation of guns is a surface
phenomenon, a reflection of the degree to which a society on all its levels is
willing symbolically to submit to the dictates of the state. I don’t think that
American history is explained by rugged individualism – in fact, to a degree,
Americans fear non-conformity and are generally willing to obey the rules,
whether the one about stopping at stop lights or the one about lining up in a
straight line, in striking contrast to other countries. At some level, however,
Americans despair of what Isaiah Berlin calls positive liberty – or what I
would call the provision of elementary subsistence by the state. Often, what is
striking about mass murder is the fact that its motive seems so trivial – a property
dispute, a bad date. It is as if the killer’s patience snaps, and the only
choice is between the landlord agreeing to repair the door and killing a number
of strangers. How that choice forms in the mind of a person points to something
about the American condition that ought to be made much more a part of the
argument about gun violence in this country.
We have to accommodate this discourse to the level of despair out there.
How much evidence do we need?
No comments:
Post a Comment