Ah, the bits that are thrown away by writers in passing! I’m reading
an essay collection by Mary McCarthy – yes, I’m one of that phantom audience
who reads old essay collections - and in
a review of Simone de Beauvoir’s account of her American tour, I come upon this
bit of diamond fit for a sceptre that was, as it were, thrown away in a bit of
meat for the periodical grinder:
“On an American
leafing through
the pages of an old library
copy, the book has a strange
effect. It is as though
an inhabitant
of Lilliput
or Brobdingnag,
coming upon a copy of Gulliver's
Travels,
sat down to read, in a foreign
tongue, of his own local customs
codified by an observer
of a different
species: everything
is at once familiar
and distorted.
The landmarks
are there,
and some of the institutions
and personages—Eighth
Avenue, Broadway, Hollywood, the Grand Canyon, Harvard,
Yale, Vassar, literary
celebrities concealed under initials; here are the
drugstores
and the cafeterias and the busses
and the traffic lights
—and yet it is all wrong,
schematized, rationalized,
like a scale model under glass.”
This
is, first of all, a great idea for a short story, say by Borges. Or by Philip
Dick. Second of all, I think it exactly hits the sentiments of those whose
lives are taken up, stolen as material, by the writer. At the moment there is a
silly lawsuit going on between Scarlett Johanssen and some French novelist who
used her name and certain biographic facts for the protagonist of one of his
novels. Surely Johanssen – if she has read the book, instead of simply
listening to a précis presented by one of her handlers – has had that feeling
of déjà jamais vu – which is when something happens that you are sure has
happened before, but not like it is happening now. McCarthy was right to choose
Swift’s book, since its play on perspectives is so thorough that one never
thinks of the Lilliputians reading it, or the Brobdignaians getting out their
microscopes to trace its print. Reversal does not, in this world, trump
reversal – the negation of the negation does not bring us back to equilibrium.
This is what consciousness is like.
No comments:
Post a Comment