“Microscopic
disorder (entropy) of a system and its surroundings (all of the relevant
universe) does not spontaneously decrease.|” This is one of the definitions of
Entropy. It is also the hope and salvation of the parent, facing the crying
baby. Patience must ride entropy over a few rough spots, and if you hum or make
shushing sounds while this is happening, all the better.
Entropy,
of course, implies order. And order implies a certain form of vision. In Rudolf
Arnheim’s Art and Entropy, he takes shuffling cards as a double-sided act – on the
one hand, increasing the disorder in a pack of cards, and on the other hand,
equalizing the chances of the players – which of course is an imperative that
only makes sense in terms of the order of the game.
“This
will become clearer if I refer to another common model for the increase of
entropy, namely shuffling. The usual interpretation of this operation is thatby shuffling,
say, a deck of cards one converts an initial order into a reasonably perfect
disorder. This, however, can be maintained only if any particular initial
sequence of cards in the deck is considered an order and if the purpose of the
shuf_ing operation is ignored. Actually,
of
course, the deck is shuf_ed because all players are to have the chance of
receiving a comparable assortment of cards. To this end, shuffling, by aiming
at a random sequence, is meant to create a homogeneous distribution of the
various kinds of cards throughout the deck. This homogeneity is the order
demanded by the purpose of the operation. To be sure, it is a low level of
order and, in fact, a limiting case of order because the only structural
condition it fulfills is that a sufficiently equal distribution shall prevail
throughout the sequence.|”
In
other words, disorder can actually be the ruse of order. This is at the heart
of the artistic instinct. Perhaps something like this is also happening when I
take Adam up and repeat something to him over and over while walking and
rocking him. Sometimes, this work. I repeat tout va bien so often that even to
me, the phrase becomes sheer comforting sound. Adam – sometimes – ceases to
cry, and begins to look around him. Or to burble. What I am aiming at, though,
is that glassy look and the heavy eyelid. In effect, I am in the process of
shuffling, of transiting between one order and the other.
At
other times, this doesn’t work at all. I will say for Adam that he is, on the
whole, a wise babe, and if he is crying or awake, there is a reason for it.
Sometimes, however, the reason is simply that he has been crying or has been
awake. At these points, the lapse into disorder is hard to contain. The ruses
fail. However, eventually Adam will sleep, and so will I. It is simply a question
of time. Adam’s strength, here, is that the question of time is a lot different
for him than for me. For me, every day that passes is in proportion to what now
seems like a mountainous sum of days. For Adam, every day that passes is in a
very sensible proportion to the amount of time he has been scanning the planet –
around five weeks, or 35 days. Thus, the minute is a huger and more monumental
thing to his instincts than to mine. He has more riding, or so he thinks, on
the minute. My strength is that, when I wrest myself from the tedious hurry of the
screen or the deadline, I can look back and see that I’ve never really been
hurt by taking more time to do things. Thrust into the mechanical world where
every contact is measured, the traffic is dangerous, the work is relative to
inflexible turnaround times, I am aware – especially holding Adam – that this
world is essentially exterior to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment