As I went out one evening – not really just one evening, but
a dateable dusk, with my son, Adam, here in Paris, October 14 – I came across a
number of photographs pinned to a brick wall on Rue des blancs manteaux. It was
a warm Sunday. Rue des blanc manteaux always has a crowd going down it on
Sundays, when the automobiles are banned, and this always brings out a number of buskers
and beggars as well, looking for pocket change or at least an audience. Adam
was interested in this scene. We passed a harpist entangled in his reverb and
speculated about the difficulty of moving his huge instrument – which towered
over his sitting figure - around the city. We passed a painter, or at least
someone who painted vaguely impressionistic street scenes, the kind of thing
spawned by such memories of impressionism as those sustained in the heads of
tourists, who might think that this school of art is still of current interest.
And perhaps, I thought, their interest in the work might be their real and
genuine encounter with art, so who am I to turn up my nose? Nevertheless, when
Adam tugged at me and made me turn back to the photographer’s piece of sidewalk
property, I did not feel that democratic charity was called for: I looked at it
and saw it was bad, very bad.
On the wall there was a sign (dancers from 1980-1990) and a
series of colored photographs depicting ballerina like dancers. Most of them,
on second glance, were the same dancer. And again, here she was in profile, and
in repose. There was a vaguely David
Hamilton air about it all, although the dancer was not a gauzy nymphet. Down on
the sidewalk itself there were spread similar photographs, plus a scarf and a
plate with some remains of a meal and a bottle that held some clear liquid that
could be eau or could be eau de vie. The photograph that attracted my six year
old son’s attention was of a woman’s face in profile, the whole stained red,
with brownish cracks in a web across the image. Adam is a boy who is always
alert for horror imagery, and he took it for granted that the red stain meant
blood. We were discussing whether this was so when the vender and begetter of
the photos came up to us. See the rest here.
No comments:
Post a Comment