Myself, I decided to read Marx’s lesser read journalism on
the Paris commune. Although innumerable rightwing tweets have gone after Marx
for Stalin, in reality, Stalin was born after Marx was dead. Marx made a very clear
political record for himself. That record is a record of responses to the
horrors of the 19th century. Those are horrors that Cold War
liberalism (of which conservatism is a variant) did not want to examine.
Instead, the Cold Warriors approved a history in which native peoples “vanished”,
and in which the pomp and panoply of the British Raj became the scene for many
a BBC and PBS series – while the eleven million people who had starved to death
in India, by 1911 (quoting the 10th edition of the Encyclopedia
Brittanica), were ushered off stage. Too bad! If you want to know what preceded
Dachau, you should look in Mike Davis’s Victorian Holocaust. Imagine a famine
in which hundreds of thousands are dying, and the government response is to
send troops out to the countryside to collect their taxes. This happened.
Imagine a labor camp where the daily release of food contained as many calories
as … well, at Dachau. This happened. We know what Marx thought about labor
camps, slavery, and the “vanishing” native people because he actually wrote
about them. He was, let us say, against it.
In any case, on to the Commune, about which I am reading.
Here’s another witness: Camille
Mendés, a sensitive sort, a poet, who remained in Paris during the Commune and
wrote a book about his experience there, entitled: Les 73 journées de la
Commune. I can’t believe the echo of Sade is wholly absent from that book.
Anyway, Camille was able to observe that thing which shocked the respectable in
the 1870s, the amazons-voyous – amazon hoodlums. Women from the working class
armed themselves and fought alongside another communard. Mendés compares them
to the famouse tricoteuses – the women who knitted while the guillotines fell.
Except these were cantinieres – cafeteria workers. Waitresses, you might say.
Never underestimate the waitresses!
‘There was not enough men with holes poked in them by bullets or
cut up by the machine gun. A strange enthusiasm took hold of the women in their
turn, and thus they fell on the field of battle as well, victims of an
execrable heroism. Who were these extraordinary beings, who abandoned the
household broom and the working woman’s needle for the cartridge? who abandoned
their children to go to be killed by the side of their lovers or husbands?
Amazon hoodlums magnificent and abject, they held their own with Penthesilia or
Theroigne de Mericourt. One saw them pass, carrying canteens, amongst those
going into combat; the men are furious, the women are ferocious, nothing moves
them, nothing discourages them. A Neuilly, a food and drink seller, wounded in
the head, had her wound bandaged and returned to take up her combat post. Another,
of the 61st bataillon, bragged of having killed a score of police and three
guardians of the peace. At Chatillon, a woman, remaining with a group of
national guardsmen, charged her rifle, fired and recharged without ceasing; she
was the last to retreat, turning around at every instant to return fire. The
woman who dispensed food in the 68th bataillon fell, killed by a mortar blast
which broke her ladle and projected it in pieces into her stomach. … Thus, what
is the furor that has carried off these furies? Do they know what they are
doing, do they understand why they are dying? Yesterday, in a boutique, rue de
Montreuil, a woman enters, rifle on her shoulder, blood on the bayonet –
shouldn’t you be home cleaning the faces of your brats? said a peaceful bourgeois.
A furious altercation broke out; the virago was so carried away that she leaped
on her adversary, bit him violently on the neck, then, falling back a few
paces, grasped her rifle and was going to fire when suddenly she grew horribly
pale, let fall her arm, and collapsed; she was dead, the anger had caused an
aneurism to rupture. Such are, at this hour, the women of the people.”
Marx of course supported the Amazon hooligans.
No comments:
Post a Comment