Pushing against the way official history is being made by and
distributed is always a futile business. It is like pushing the wrong way
against a revolving door. The very design of the door works against you. Of
course, its builders claim that this design reflects the facts. It is a
fact-based narrative. But this is only true to the extent that the narrative
includes some legitimating facts. It excludes the inconvient, the outlier, and
most of all, those incidents that it is too dangerous and upsetting to reflect
upon. Those who do reflect on these things sometimes mistake the irresistable
push back as an apocalyptic instrument, a conspiracy; they sometimes put too
much stock on the outliers. But they are certainly correct that the narrative
is not primarily fact-based, but rather a manner of manipulating facts to
support a narrative whose motifs are already in place. The direction of the
revolving door has been set. And the more people who pass through it, the more
obvious it seems. After a while, though, maybe in say three hundred years, the
resistors will get their chance. Revisions will be made. “New” facts will be
discovered – or rather, will be promoted to key positions within a new
narrative. Reflections will be made. By this time the door has gotten squeaky,
it doesn’t push as well. Traffic has moved on to other doors. At this point
some average person can actually push against and break the old door. What do
you know, people will say, there weren’t any witches. What do you know, people
will say, perhaps 500,000 Africans died in transit or on plantations in
Saint-Domingue alone in the Age of Reason. What do you know, they will say, one
of the impulses of the American
Revolution was that there wasn’t enough being done by the British to
exterminate the American Indians. What do you know? But by this time the
direction of the revolving dooor wil have become part of history – the way
history is taught, the way expections for other parts of the story have been
set. The French Revolution, for instance, had the terror, leading straight to
the Gulag – a narrative repeated over and over during the Cold War and since - and
the American revolution, in this same script, was the forerunner of moderate
democracy. The slaves and the Indians will figure, at best, as a rediscovered
sideshow, moral detritus.
“I’m so bored. I hate my life.” - Britney Spears
Das Langweilige ist interessant geworden, weil das Interessante angefangen hat langweilig zu werden. – Thomas Mann
"Never for money/always for love" - The Talking Heads
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My Mount Rushmore: DIDION MALCOLM ADLER HARDWICK
I have been thinking of Laura Kipnis’s applaudable and much applauded review of Lili Anolik’s book comparing the wondrous Eve Babitz -acco...
-
You can skip this boring part ... LI has not been able to keep up with Chabert in her multi-entry assault on Derrida. As in a proper duel, t...
-
Being the sort of guy who plunges, headfirst, into the latest fashion, LI pondered two options, this week. We could start an exploratory com...
-
The most dangerous man the world has ever known was not Attila the Hun or Mao Zedong. He was not Adolf Hitler. In fact, the most dangerous m...
No comments:
Post a Comment